SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi

[Division & Section] Law Division
Partner
2006 Admission as Attorney-at-law in Japan
2002-2005 and since 2008 Admission as Patent Attorney
Telephone: +81-80-2216-0973
Email: tsueyoshi@yuasa-hara.co.jp
Practice Areas
Unfair Competition Copyright Law General Corporate Cross-border Practices Intellectual Property Patents Designs Trademarks
Major Areas of Expertise
Intellectual Property (contentious and litigation (infringement, revocation actions against JPO’s decision at the IP high court and invalidation actions at the JPO) and transaction), General Corporate (contract matters (ex. license, co-research and development, contract manufacturing and clinical development); Pharmaceutical Affairs
Membership & Other Qualifications
Japan Federation of Bar Associations; Daiichi Tokyo Bar Association; Japan Association of Industrial Property Law; The Copyright Law Association of Japan; AIPPI-JAPAN; Case A hazardous materials engineer
Education & Experience
Academic History
- 1992
- Department of Chemistry, School of Science, The University of Tokyo (BS)
- 1997
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate school of Science, The University of Tokyo (Ph.D.)
- 2006
- Legal Training & Research Institute
Job History
- 1997-2002
- Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Yokohama Research Center
- 2002-2005
- Yuasa and Hara, Patent Division as Patent Attorney
- 2006-present
- Yuasa and Hara
Professional Experiences & Activities
- 2012-present
- WG member of Q229 (The use of prosecution history in post-grant patent proceeding), Q235 (Term of copy right protection), Q241 (IP licensing and insolvency), Q246 (Exceptions and limitations to copyright protection for libraries, archives and educational and research institutions) and 2016-copyright (Liking and making available on the internet) of AIPPI-Japan
- 2013-2015,2020-2022
- Lectureship in Japan Patent Attorney Association’s course of infringement qualification
- 2015-present
- Advisory board of infringement judgment (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; Unfair Competition Prevention Act)
- 2015-2023
- Member of AIPPI Q224 Standing Committee("Enforcement")
- 2018
- Vice-Chair of AIPPI World Congress and Chairperson of AIPPI-Japan WG group for Study Question “Joint Liability”
- 2020
- Chairperson of AIPPI-Japan WG group for Study Question “Rights in Data”
- 2023
- Chairperson of AIPPI-Japan WG group for Study Question 287“Responsibility of online marketplaces for online infringement”
- 2023-
- Member of AIPPI Communications Committee (Statutory Committee)
- 2025
- Chairperson of AIPPI-Japan WG group for Study Question 296: “Preliminary Injunctions: Requirements for compensating damage suffered by Defendant”
Awards & Achievements
・IAM Patent 1000
 Global Leader 2025
 Litigation, Japan: Domestic 2019-2025
 Transactions, Japan: Domestic 2024-2025
 Trade secret, Japan: Domestic 2025
・Chambers Global
 Intellectual Property: Domestic in Japan    2020-2025
・Chambers Asia-Pacific
 Intellectual Property: Domestic in Japan  2020-2025
 Life Sciences in Japan           2019-2025
・Lexology Index (formerly Who’s Who Legal) IP-Patents 2022-2025
・Lexology Index (formerly Who’s Who Legal) Healthcare and Life Sciences – Patent Litigation 2024-2025
・Lexology Index (formerly Who’s Who Legal): Japan
 Life Sciences 		2016-2025
 Intellectual Property	2022-2025
・IP Stars 2021-2025, Japan (Patent Star)
・IAM and WTR: The Global IP Awards 2024
 The Japan Patent Litigation Firm of the Year
・Shortlisted in Practitioner of the Year (Japan), Managing IP Asia-Pacific Awards 2023
・“Best Performing Lawyers Rankings 2022” in the “Corporate Legal & Tax Affairs and Lawyer Survey” by the NIKKEI (the Nihon Keizai Shimbun)
12th in the category of Intellectual Properties, selected by companies
・Judgement of Tokyo D. Ct., Dec. 20, 2022, HANREI TIMES, No.1516, p.216 (passing off; indication of goods or service by shape of goods)
・Nippon Chemiphar v. Shionogi and AstraZeneca; Judgement of IP High Ct. (Grand Panel), April 13, 2018, HANREI TIMES No.1460, p.125 (Case 2016 (gyo-ke) 10182 and 10184)
(IP high court judgment of Crestor® case; Standing to sue and Inventive steps (finding of prior art invention in chemistry))
・JPO v. Genentech; MINSHU Vol.69, No.7, p.1912, Judgment of Sup. Ct., Nov. 17, 2015, Case 2014 (gyou-hi) 356
(Supreme Court judgment of Bevacizumab (Avastin® ) case; Patent Term Extension (SPC))
・Genetech v. JPO; Judgment of IP High Ct. (Grand Panel), May 30, 2014, HANREI JIHO, No. 2232, p.3 (Case 2013 (gyou-ke)10195-10198)
(IP high court judgment of Bevacizumab (Avastin® ) case; Patent Term Extension (SPC))
・Judgement of IP H. Ct., Sep. 25, 2014, HANREI JIHO, No.2241, p.142 (Patent Term Extension (SPC))
・Judgement of Tokyo D. Ct., Mar. 20, 2014, HANREI JIHO, No.2254, p.91
・Comments on Media
NIKKEI (June 30, 2025, June 15, 2024, December 28, 2021)
The Yomiuri Shimbun(July 3, 2024, May 31, 2024)
KYODO News(March 4, 2025)
Legal Updates
Publications
- 
						
							Publications Unfair Competition Laws、Cases Likelihood of Confusion as aTolerable Limit-Relationship among Requirements in Art.2(1)(i)of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Actual Role/Function of Likelihood of Confusion SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications “Premium of final products in damages and its justifiable reasons” in “Pioneering the Future of Intellectual Property Law”, collected papers for 70th birthday of Mr. Ryoichi MIMURA (NIPPON HYRON SHA Co., Ltd, 2024) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications General Corporate、Intellectual Property Responsibility of online marketplaces for online infringement of industrial property right SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property、Patents Claim Construction of Use Invention and Availability of Injunction and Scope of Damages on the Basis of Patent of Use Invention – Conversion of Indirect Infringing Products under Process Invention into Direct Infringement of Product Invention and Restriction of Enforcement Derived from Patentability Relying on Use in Future SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications General Corporate、Intellectual Property Laws Law of Raw Data (Japan Chapter) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property Others Report of AIPPI World Congress Online Study Question (Copyright) Rights in Data SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property Others Study Question (Copyright) Rights in Data SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Others “Assessment of inventive steps when a differentiating feature has multiple technical meanings – positioning of remarkable effects –” SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property Others Merits and demerits of revision of company regulation for employee invention SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property Others Study Question (General) Joint Liability for IP Infringement SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Others Patent Infringement SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property Others Study Question (General) Joint Liability for IP Infringement SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Intentional Exclusion under the Doctrine of Equivaqlents – Balance between Responsibility of Patentee and Protection of Third Party’s Trust SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications General Corporate、Cross-border Practices Laws、Others Lexology Navigator – Life sciences: product regulation and liability (Japan Chapter) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property Others Legal risk management upon preparation of documents: Approach to settlement of IP disputes SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Laws、Others Role of problem to be solved in assessment of non-obviousness (inventive step) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property、Patents Laws、Others Article 102 of the Patent Act and damages and causation under tort law SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property、Patents Cases Exhaustion or implied license of a patented product upon a patentee’s sale of a component – The Apple v. Samsung case – SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Laws Proving of description requirement and inventive steps by post-filing evidence SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Intellectual Property Laws Question 241 IP Licensing and Insolvency (AIPPI 2014 Toronto) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Inducement cannot be applied to the case in which multiple parties jointly perform invention with dividing steps (joint infringement / divided infringement) – Limelight Network v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. et al. (Judgment of U.S. S. Ct., June 2nd, 2014) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Laws Damage claims by multiple right holder of co-owned patent – co-existence of damage claim under Patent Act, Article 102, pargraph1 or 2 and that under paragraph 3 SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Patent eligibility of computer-implemented invention CLS Bank International et al., v. Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Trademarks Cases Infringement of Trademark Right on the Internet – who is responsible for tort liability and demanded for injunction SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Trademarks Cases “Cache”case (Defense of non-occurrence of damage under Trademark Act, Article 38, paragraph 3 even under infringement) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Substantial judgment of prohibition of added new matter at amendment and correction and its relationship with inventive steps and description requirements on the basis of the judgment of the Intellectual Property H. Ct., November 14, 2012 SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Claim construction for patentability and that for infringement – Does the claim construction in examination coincide with that for judgment of infringement? SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases The relationship between Article 101, item 1 & 2 of the Patent Act on a multifunctional product comprising a component exclusive to a patent – when the requirement of non general-purpose under Article 101, item 2 of of the Patent Act is applied ? SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Laws Significance of each of enablement and support requirements as an independent requirement SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Recent trend of heavily weighting of “Problem” and finding of “Motivation” in the judgments of inventive steps in the Intellectual Property High Court SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Others What I have felt in the course of transition from a scientist to a lawyer SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Countermeasure of Generic Drug Company against too broad Use Code of a Brand Drug Company (Construction of the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Laws Application documents SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases A case where the factor of “whether a problem to be solved was easily set” should be taken into account in addition to the factor of “whether a specific structure was easily achieved for solution of the problem” SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases The Level of Mental Element of an Inducer necessary for Inducement of Infringement – Supreme Court Judgment on the Global-Tech Appliance Inc. v SEB S.A. Case SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases The U.S. supreme court judgment clarifying the standard of “clear and convincing evidence” for invalidating a patent Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership et al. _ U.S. _ (2011) SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Does any act outside the U.S. concerning any products for the U.S. market infringes patent right of the US as offer to sell or sale? SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Recent trend in judgment on inventive steps in the Intellectual Property High Court SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Can 35 U.S.C. 271 (f) be applied to a method claim? SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases When a software exclusively used for a patented method invention is incorporated into a versatile product, does sale of such product infringe the patent? SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Can parent company recover lost profits when parent company grants license to subsidiary to perform claimed invention? SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases Comparison in the patent system and joint infringement between Japan and the U.S. SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases The requirements of infringement in so-called joint infringement in the case where multiple parties jointly practice an patented invention- SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases The requirements and the scope of the prior use right SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases The case where a scope of a patented invention covers a structure beyond the claimed wording SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases The Federal Supreme Court raises an alert over the rigid TSM test of CAFC SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							Publications Patents Cases The subjective requirement for active inducement SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
Seminars
- 
						
							symposium 1st Potsdam Talk about Data Economy Law of Raw Data SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							training 9th Annual Waseda Global Patent Law Conference SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							lecture Recent judgments on inventive steps SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							symposium Patent Term Extensions and Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) – Latest Developments SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							lecture Indirect Infringement and its countermeasures SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							lecture Recent trend of heavily weighting of “Problem” and finding of “Motivation” in the judgments of inventive steps in the Intellectual Property High Court SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							lecture Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB – Revision on requirements of inducement- SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							lecture A case where the factor of “whether a problem to be solved was easily set” should be taken into account in addition to the factor of “whether a specific structure was easily achieved for solution of the problem”(the judgment of the Intellectual Property High Court on Jan. 31, 2011 (Case No. 2010 (gyou-ke) 10075 SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
- 
						
							lecture Claim Arrangement –Joint Infringement and Exhaustion SUEYOSHI, Tsuyoshi 
Telephone
+81(3)3270-6641



